本当質問と回答の練習モード

現代技術のおかげで、オンラインで学ぶことで人々はより広い範囲の知識（DCPLA有効な練習問題集）を知られるように、人々は電子機器の利便性に慣れてきました。このため、私たちはあなたの記憶能力を効果的かつ適切に高めるという目標をどのように達成するかに焦点を当てます。したがって、DSCI Certification　DCPLA練習問題と答えが最も効果的です。あなたはこのDSCI Certified Privacy Lead Assessor DCPLA certification有用な試験参考書でコア知識を覚えていて、練習中にDSCI Certified Privacy Lead Assessor DCPLA certification試験の内容も熟知されます。これは時間を節約し、効率的です。

デモをダウンロードする

現代IT業界の急速な発展、より多くの労働者、卒業生やIT専攻の他の人々は、昇進や高給などのチャンスを増やすために、プロのDCPLA試験認定を受ける必要があります。 試験に合格させる高品質のDSCI Certified Privacy Lead Assessor DCPLA certification試験模擬pdf版があなたにとって最良の選択です。私たちのDSCI Certified Privacy Lead Assessor DCPLA certificationテストトピック試験では、あなたは簡単にDCPLA試験に合格し、私たちのDSCI Certified Privacy Lead Assessor DCPLA certification試験資料から多くのメリットを享受します。

信頼できるアフターサービス

私たちのDCPLA試験学習資料で試験準備は簡単ですが、使用中に問題が発生する可能性があります。DCPLA pdf版問題集に関する問題がある場合は、私たちに電子メールを送って、私たちの助けを求めることができます。たあなたが新旧の顧客であっても、私たちはできるだけ早くお客様のお手伝いをさせて頂きます。候補者がDSCI Certified Privacy Lead Assessor DCPLA certification試験に合格する手助けをしている私たちのコミットメントは、当業界において大きな名声を獲得しています。一週24時間のサービスは弊社の態度を示しています。私たちは候補者の利益を考慮し、我々のDCPLA有用テスト参考書はあなたのDCPLA試験合格に最良の方法であることを保証します。

要するに、プロのDCPLA試験認定はあなた自身を計る最も効率的な方法であり、企業は教育の背景だけでなく、あなたの職業スキルによって従業員を採用することを指摘すると思います。世界中の技術革新によって、あなたをより強くする重要な方法はDSCI Certified Privacy Lead Assessor DCPLA certification試験認定を受けることです。だから、私たちの信頼できる高品質のDSCI Certification有効練習問題集を選ぶと、DCPLA試験に合格し、より明るい未来を受け入れるのを助けます。

DCPLA試験学習資料の三つバージョンの便利性

私たちの候補者はほとんどがオフィスワーカーです。あなたはDSCI Certified Privacy Lead Assessor DCPLA certification試験の準備にあまり時間がかからないことを理解しています。したがって、異なるバージョンのDCPLA試験トピック問題をあなたに提供します。読んで簡単に印刷するには、PDFバージョンを選択して、メモを取るのは簡単です。 もしあなたがDSCI Certified Privacy Lead Assessor DCPLA certificationの真のテスト環境に慣れるには、ソフト（PCテストエンジン）バージョンが最適です。そして最後のバージョン、DCPLAテストオンラインエンジンはどの電子機器でも使用でき、ほとんどの機能はソフトバージョンと同じです。DSCI Certified Privacy Lead Assessor DCPLA certification試験勉強練習の3つのバージョンの柔軟性と機動性により、いつでもどこでも候補者が学習できます。私たちの候補者にとって選択は自由でそれは時間のロースを減少します。

DSCI Certified Privacy Lead Assessor DCPLA certification 認定 DCPLA 試験問題:

1. With respect to privacy monitoring and incident management process, which of the following should be a part of a standard incident handling process?
I) Incident identification and notification
II) Investigation and remediation
III) Root cause analysis
IV) User awareness training on how to report incidents

A) I and II
B) All of the Above
C) I, II and III
D) III and IV

2. Which of the following wasn't prescribed as a privacy principle under the OECD Privacy Guidelines, 1980?

A) Openness
B) Purpose Specification
C) Data Minimization
D) Security Safeguard

3. Which of the following best describes 'Processing'?

A) Processing is recording and destruction of personal data
B) Processing is a blanket term used for the wide range of operations performed on personal data
C) Processing is storage and structuring personal data
D) Processing is collection and use of personal data

4. FILL BLANK
RCI and PCM
In April 2011, the rules were issued under Section 43A of the IT Act by the Government of India and the
'body corporates' were required to comply with these rules. The Corporate legal team tried to understand and interpret the rules but struggled to understand its applicability esp. to client relationships and business functions. So, the company hired an IT Act legal expert to advise them on the Section 43A rules.
To start with, the company identified the PI dealt with by business functions as part of the earlier visibility exercise, but it wanted to reassure itself. Therefore, a specific exercise was conducted to revisit 'sensitive personal information' dealt by business functions. It was realized that the company collects lot of SPI of its employees and therefore 'reasonable security practices' need to be adhered to by the functions that deal with SPI. It was also ascertained that many of this SPI is being dealt by third parties, some of which are also located outside India. To meet the requirements of the rules, the company reviewed all the contracts and inserted a clause - 'the service provider shall implement reasonable security practices and procedures as per the IT (Amendment) Act, 2008'. Some of the large service providers were ISO 27001 certified and they claimed that they fulfill the requirements of 'reasonable security practices'. However, some SME service providers did not understand what would 'reasonable security practices' imply and requested the company to clarify, which referred them to Rule 8 of the Section 43A. Some small scale service providers expressed their unwillingness to get ISO certified, given the costs involved.
(Note: Candidates are requested to make and state assumptions wherever appropriate to reach a definitive conclusion) Introduction and Background XYZ is a major India based IT and Business Process Management (BPM) service provider listed at BSE and NSE. It has more than 1.5 lakh employees operating in 100 offices across 30 countries. It serves more than 500 clients across industry verticals - BFSI, Retail, Government, Healthcare, Telecom among others in Americas, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Middle East and Africa. The company provides IT services including application development and maintenance, IT Infrastructure management, consulting, among others. It also offers IT products mainly for its BFSI customers.
The company is witnessing phenomenal growth in the BPM services over last few years including Finance & Accounting including credit card processing, Payroll processing, Customer support, Legal Process Outsourcing, among others and has rolled out platform based services. Most of the company's revenue comes from the US from the BFSI sector. In order to diversify its portfolio, the company is looking to expand its operations in Europe. India, too has attracted company's attention given the phenomenal increase in domestic IT spend esp. by the government through various large scale IT projects. The company is also very aggressive in the cloud and mobility space, with a strong focus on delivery of cloud services. When it comes to expanding operations in Europe, company is facing difficulties in realizing the full potential of the market because of privacy related concerns of the clients arising from the stringent regulatory requirements based on EU General Data Protection Regulation (EU GDPR).
To get better access to this market, the company decided to invest in privacy, so that it is able to provide increased assurance to potential clients in the EU and this will also benefit its US operations because privacy concerns are also on rise in the US. It will also help company leverage outsourcing opportunities in the Healthcare sector in the US which would involve protection of sensitive medical records of the US citizens.
The company believes that privacy will also be a key differentiator in the cloud business going forward. In short, privacy was taken up as a strategic initiative in the company in early 2011.
Since XYZ had an internal consulting arm, it assigned the responsibility of designing and implementing an enterprise wide privacy program to the consulting arm. The consulting arm had very good expertise in information security consulting but had limited expertise in the privacy domain. The project was to be driven by CIO's office, in close consultation with the Corporate Information Security and Legal functions.
Did the company take sufficient steps to protect SPI dealt by its service providers and ensure that it complies with the regulatory requirements? Was referring to 'reasonable security practices' sufficient in the contracts or the company should have also considered some other measures for privacy protection as well? (250 to 500 words)

5. FILL BLANK
VPI
As a starting point, the consultants undertook a visibility exercise to understand the type of personal information (PI) being dealt with within the organization and also by third parties and the scope was to cover all the client relationships (IT services and BPM both) and functions. They met with the client relationship and business function owners to collect this data. The consultants did a mapping exercise to identify PI and associated attributes including whether company directly collects the PI, how it is accessed, transmitted, stored and what are the applicable regulatory and contractual requirements. Given the enormous scale of the exercise (enterprise wide), the consultant classified the PI as financial information, health related information, personally identifiable information, etc. and collected the rest of the attributes against this classification. When understanding the underlying technology environment, the consultants restricted themselves only to the technology environment that was under company's ownership and premises and did not continue the exercise for client side environment. This was done because relationship owners seemed reluctant to share such client specific details. Only in 2 relationships, were the relationship heads proactive to introduce the consultants to the clients and get the requisite information. The analysis of the environment in these 2 relationships revealed that even though lots of restrictions were imposed at the company side, the same restrictions were not available at the client side.
Many business functions were also availing services from third party service providers. Though these functions were aware of the type of PI dealt by third parties, they were not aware of the technology environment at the third parties. In one odd case, personal information of a company employee was accidentally leaked by the employee of the third party through the social networking site. The consultants relied on whatever information was provided by the functions w.r.t. third parties. After finishing the data collection, the consultant used the information to create information flow maps highlighting the flow of information across systems deployed at the company premises. This work helped them have a high level view of PI dealt by the company. The data collection exercise has been conducted only once by the consultants. The visibility exercise empowered the management to have a company-wide view of PI and how it flows across the organization. This information was coupled with the security controls / practices deployed at the relationship or function level to derive the risk posture of the PI.
(Note: Candidates are requested to make and state assumptions wherever appropriate to reach a definitive conclusion) Introduction and Background XYZ is a major India based IT and Business Process Management (BPM) service provider listed at BSE and NSE. It has more than 1.5 lakh employees operating in 100 offices across 30 countries. It serves more than 500 clients across industry verticals - BFSI, Retail, Government, Healthcare, Telecom among others in Americas, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Middle East and Africa. The company provides IT services including application development and maintenance, IT Infrastructure management, consulting, among others. It also offers IT products mainly for its BFSI customers.
The company is witnessing phenomenal growth in the BPM services over last few years including Finance & Accounting including credit card processing, Payroll processing, Customer support, Legal Process Outsourcing, among others and has rolled out platform based services. Most of the company's revenue comes from the US from the BFSI sector. In order to diversify its portfolio, the company is looking to expand its operations in Europe. India, too has attracted company's attention given the phenomenal increase in domestic IT spend esp. by the government through various large scale IT projects.
The company is also very aggressive in the cloud and mobility space, with a strong focus on delivery of cloud services. When it comes to expanding operations in Europe, company is facing difficulties in realizing the full potential of the market because of privacy related concerns of the clients arising from the stringent regulatory requirements based on EU General Data Protection Regulation (EU GDPR).
To get better access to this market, the company decided to invest in privacy, so that it is able to provide increased assurance to potential clients in the EU and this will also benefit its US operations because privacy concerns are also on rise in the US. It will also help company leverage outsourcing opportunities in the Healthcare sector in the US which would involve protection of sensitive medical records of the US citizens.
The company believes that privacy will also be a key differentiator in the cloud business going forward. In short, privacy was taken up as a strategic initiative in the company in early 2011.
Since XYZ had an internal consulting arm, it assigned the responsibility of designing and implementing an enterprise wide privacy program to the consulting arm. The consulting arm had very good expertise in information security consulting but had limited expertise in the privacy domain. The project was to be driven by CIO's office, in close consultation with the Corporate Information Security and Legal functions.
Was the visibility exercise adequately carried out? What gaps did you notice? (250 to 500 words)

質問と回答：