Tech4Examはどんな学習資料を提供していますか?
現代技術は人々の生活と働きの仕方を革新します(DCPLA試験学習資料)。 広く普及しているオンラインシステムとプラットフォームは最近の現象となり、IT業界は最も見通しがある業界(DCPLA試験認定)となっています。 企業や機関では、候補者に優れた教育の背景が必要であるという事実にもかかわらず、プロフェッショナル認定のようなその他の要件があります。それを考慮すると、適切なDSCI DSCI Certified Privacy Lead Assessor DCPLA certification試験認定は候補者が高給と昇進を得られるのを助けます。
DCPLA試験学習資料を開発する専業チーム
私たちはDCPLA試験認定分野でよく知られる会社として、プロのチームにDSCI Certified Privacy Lead Assessor DCPLA certification試験復習問題の研究と開発に専念する多くの専門家があります。したがって、我々のDSCI Certification試験学習資料がDCPLA試験の一流復習資料であることを保証することができます。私たちは、DSCI Certification DCPLA試験サンプル問題の研究に約10年間集中して、候補者がDCPLA試験に合格するという目標を決して変更しません。私たちのDCPLA試験学習資料の質は、DSCI専門家の努力によって保証されています。それで、あなたは弊社を信じて、我々のDSCI Certified Privacy Lead Assessor DCPLA certification最新テスト問題集を選んでいます。
無料デモをごダウンロードいただけます
様々な復習資料が市場に出ていることから、多くの候補者は、どの資料が適切かを知りません。この状況を考慮に入れて、私たちはDSCI DCPLAの無料ダウンロードデモを候補者に提供します。弊社のウェブサイトにアクセスしてDSCI Certified Privacy Lead Assessor DCPLA certificationデモをダウンロードするだけで、DCPLA試験復習問題を購入するかどうかを判断するのに役立ちます。多数の新旧の顧客の訪問が当社の能力を証明しています。私たちのDCPLA試験の学習教材は、私たちの市場におけるファーストクラスのものであり、あなたにとっても良い選択だと確信しています。
DCPLA試験認定を取られるメリット
ほとんどの企業では従業員が専門試験の認定資格を取得する必要があるため、DCPLA試験の認定資格がどれほど重要であるかわかります。テストに合格すれば、昇進のチャンスとより高い給料を得ることができます。あなたのプロフェッショナルな能力が権威によって認められると、それはあなたが急速に発展している情報技術に優れていることを意味し、上司や大学から注目を受けます。より明るい未来とより良い生活のために私たちの信頼性の高いDCPLA最新試験問題集を選択しましょう。
DSCI Certified Privacy Lead Assessor DCPLA certification試験学習資料での高い復習効率
ほとんどの候補者にとって、特にオフィスワーカー、DCPLA試験の準備は、多くの時間とエネルギーを必要とする難しい作業です。だから、適切なDCPLA試験資料を選択することは、DCPLA試験にうまく合格するのに重要です。高い正確率があるDCPLA有効学習資料によって、候補者はDSCI Certified Privacy Lead Assessor DCPLA certification試験のキーポイントを捉え、試験の内容を熟知します。あなたは約2日の時間をかけて我々のDCPLA試験学習資料を練習し、DCPLA試験に簡単でパスします。
DSCI Certified Privacy Lead Assessor DCPLA certification 認定 DCPLA 試験問題:
1. Which of the following provisions of Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 deal with protection of PI or SPDI of Individuals?
A) Section 43A & Section 65
B) Section 65
C) Section 43A
D) Section 43A & Section 72A
2. FILL BLANK
RCI and PCM
Given its global operations, the company is exposed to multiple regulations (privacy related) across the globe and needs to comply mostly through contracts for client relationships and directly for business functions. The corporate legal team is responsible for managing the contracts and understanding, interpreting and translating the legal requirements. There is no formal tracking of regulations done. The knowledge about regulations mainly comes through interaction with the client team. In most of the contracts, the clients have simply referred to the applicable legislations without going any further in terms of their applicability and impact on the company. Since business expansion is the priority, the contracts have been signed by the company without fully understanding their applicability and impact. Incidentally, when the privacy initiatives were being rolled out, a major data breach occurred at one of the healthcare clients located in the US. The US state data protection legislation required the client to notify the data breach. During investigations, it emerged that the data breach happened because of some vulnerability in the system owned by the client but managed by the company and the breach actually happened 5 months back and came to notice now. The system was used to maintain medical records of the patients. This vulnerability had been earlier identified by a third party vulnerability assessment of the system and the closure of vulnerability was assigned to the company. The company had made the requisite changes and informed the client. The client, however, was of the view that the changes were actually not made by the company and they therefore violated the terms of contract which stated that - "the company shall deploy appropriate organizational and technology measures for protection of personal information in compliance with the XX state data protection legislation." The company could not produce necessary evidences to prove that the configuration changes were actually made by it (including when these were made).
(Note: Candidates are requested to make and state assumptions wherever appropriate to reach a definitive conclusion) Introduction and Background XYZ is a major India based IT and Business Process Management (BPM) service provider listed at BSE and NSE. It has more than 1.5 lakh employees operating in 100 offices across 30 countries. It serves more than 500 clients across industry verticals - BFSI, Retail, Government, Healthcare, Telecom among others in Americas, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Middle East and Africa. The company provides IT services including application development and maintenance, IT Infrastructure management, consulting, among others. It also offers IT products mainly for its BFSI customers.
The company is witnessing phenomenal growth in the BPM services over last few years including Finance & Accounting including credit card processing, Payroll processing, Customer support, Legal Process Outsourcing, among others and has rolled out platform based services. Most of the company's revenue comes from the US from the BFSI sector. In order to diversify its portfolio, the company is looking to expand its operations in Europe. India, too has attracted company's attention given the phenomenal increase in domestic IT spend esp. by the government through various large scale IT projects. The company is also very aggressive in the cloud and mobility space, with a strong focus on delivery of cloud services. When it comes to expanding operations in Europe, company is facing difficulties in realizing the full potential of the market because of privacy related concerns of the clients arising from the stringent regulatory requirements based on EU General Data Protection Regulation (EU GDPR).
To get better access to this market, the company decided to invest in privacy, so that it is able to provide increased assurance to potential clients in the EU and this will also benefit its US operations because privacy concerns are also on rise in the US. It will also help company leverage outsourcing opportunities in the Healthcare sector in the US which would involve protection of sensitive medical records of the US citizens.
The company believes that privacy will also be a key differentiator in the cloud business going forward. In short, privacy was taken up as a strategic initiative in the company in early 2011.
Since XYZ had an internal consulting arm, it assigned the responsibility of designing and implementing an enterprise wide privacy program to the consulting arm. The consulting arm had very good expertise in information security consulting but had limited expertise in the privacy domain. The project was to be driven by CIO's office, in close consultation with the Corporate Information Security and Legal functions.
Why do you think the company failed to defend itself against client accusations? (250 to 500 words)
3. Which of the following is not in line with the modem definition of Consent?
A) Consent is taken by clear and affirmative action
B) Purpose of processing should be informed to the individual before consenting
C) Consent should be bundled in nature
D) Consenting individual should have the ability to withdraw consent
4. Certification once granted, will be valid for period of _______ years subject to surveillance assessments.
A) 5
B) 1
C) 4
D) 3
5. FILL BLANK
VPI
As a starting point, the consultants undertook a visibility exercise to understand the type of personal information (PI) being dealt with within the organization and also by third parties and the scope was to cover all the client relationships (IT services and BPM both) and functions. They met with the client relationship and business function owners to collect this data. The consultants did a mapping exercise to identify PI and associated attributes including whether company directly collects the PI, how it is accessed, transmitted, stored and what are the applicable regulatory and contractual requirements. Given the enormous scale of the exercise (enterprise wide), the consultant classified the PI as financial information, health related information, personally identifiable information, etc. and collected the rest of the attributes against this classification. When understanding the underlying technology environment, the consultants restricted themselves only to the technology environment that was under company's ownership and premises and did not continue the exercise for client side environment. This was done because relationship owners seemed reluctant to share such client specific details. Only in 2 relationships, were the relationship heads proactive to introduce the consultants to the clients and get the requisite information. The analysis of the environment in these 2 relationships revealed that even though lots of restrictions were imposed at the company side, the same restrictions were not available at the client side.
Many business functions were also availing services from third party service providers. Though these functions were aware of the type of PI dealt by third parties, they were not aware of the technology environment at the third parties. In one odd case, personal information of a company employee was accidentally leaked by the employee of the third party through the social networking site. The consultants relied on whatever information was provided by the functions w.r.t. third parties. After finishing the data collection, the consultant used the information to create information flow maps highlighting the flow of information across systems deployed at the company premises. This work helped them have a high level view of PI dealt by the company. The data collection exercise has been conducted only once by the consultants. The visibility exercise empowered the management to have a company-wide view of PI and how it flows across the organization. This information was coupled with the security controls / practices deployed at the relationship or function level to derive the risk posture of the PI.
(Note: Candidates are requested to make and state assumptions wherever appropriate to reach a definitive conclusion) Introduction and Background XYZ is a major India based IT and Business Process Management (BPM) service provider listed at BSE and NSE. It has more than 1.5 lakh employees operating in 100 offices across 30 countries. It serves more than 500 clients across industry verticals - BFSI, Retail, Government, Healthcare, Telecom among others in Americas, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Middle East and Africa. The company provides IT services including application development and maintenance, IT Infrastructure management, consulting, among others. It also offers IT products mainly for its BFSI customers.
The company is witnessing phenomenal growth in the BPM services over last few years including Finance & Accounting including credit card processing, Payroll processing, Customer support, Legal Process Outsourcing, among others and has rolled out platform based services. Most of the company's revenue comes from the US from the BFSI sector. In order to diversify its portfolio, the company is looking to expand its operations in Europe. India, too has attracted company's attention given the phenomenal increase in domestic IT spend esp. by the government through various large scale IT projects.
The company is also very aggressive in the cloud and mobility space, with a strong focus on delivery of cloud services. When it comes to expanding operations in Europe, company is facing difficulties in realizing the full potential of the market because of privacy related concerns of the clients arising from the stringent regulatory requirements based on EU General Data Protection Regulation (EU GDPR).
To get better access to this market, the company decided to invest in privacy, so that it is able to provide increased assurance to potential clients in the EU and this will also benefit its US operations because privacy concerns are also on rise in the US. It will also help company leverage outsourcing opportunities in the Healthcare sector in the US which would involve protection of sensitive medical records of the US citizens.
The company believes that privacy will also be a key differentiator in the cloud business going forward. In short, privacy was taken up as a strategic initiative in the company in early 2011.
Since XYZ had an internal consulting arm, it assigned the responsibility of designing and implementing an enterprise wide privacy program to the consulting arm. The consulting arm had very good expertise in information security consulting but had limited expertise in the privacy domain. The project was to be driven by CIO's office, in close consultation with the Corporate Information Security and Legal functions.
Was the visibility exercise adequately carried out? What gaps did you notice? (250 to 500 words)
質問と回答:
質問 # 1 正解: C | 質問 # 2 正解: メンバーにのみ表示されます | 質問 # 3 正解: C | 質問 # 4 正解: D | 質問 # 5 正解: メンバーにのみ表示されます |